Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 18:51:21 -0500 From: jack hirschfeld To: fins@access.digex.net Subject: Re: Political "Cleansing" of the Press--in Congress Vigdor, please accept these comments regarding efforts to decertify you as a working journalist: 1. The willingness of a journalist to distribute his writings independent of payment by the reader is no criterion as to the seriousness of his labors. I have long admired your indefatigable efforts to put your observations before the largest possible audience, and your conscientious response to any and all challenges regarding the factual nature of your reportage. 2. Efforts to discredit your professionalism tend to reinforce, rather than undermine, the fact that you are an effective journalist. The work of a "hobbyist" can be ignored or dismissed, but your work - the work of a trenchant and uncompromising journalist - cannot be dismissed; and when it is clearly finding an audience which stands in opposition to established forces, they feel they must resort to tactics which will squelch your voice. To me, this action against you DEMONSTRATES a high regard (albeit fearful) of your professionalism. 3. I am a regular recipient of FINS, and I look forward to your dispatches. Since you so willingly distribute them free, I regret that I have not before this offered to subscribe. I always assumed you managed somehow, because even if paid, a subscription is so inexpensive. Please sign me up immediately, When billing me, be sure to spell my name correctly: JACK HIRSCHFELD proud to stand beside you in this struggle. 4. If the opinion of the Executive Committee were allowed to stand, a large community of readers would be deprived of an important source of news and information - often the first source, and sometimes the only source. The mainstream press often writes of the "people's right to know." Few, however, act to guarantee that right as consistently as Vigdor Schreibman. -- Jack Hirschfeld What'll I do when you are far away? jack@his.com