Re: [HM] earliest Pythagorean theorem


Subject: Re: [HM] earliest Pythagorean theorem
From: K. Subramaniam (subra@hbcse.tifr.res.in)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2000 - 03:28:44 EST


Dear Dinesh,

Could you give a reference or a summary argument to support the following:

> Bear in mind that the re-dating, in 1990s, of the Vedas to 4300BC (based on
> the astronomical observations in the RigVeda) implies that the ShulbhaSutras
> have to be re-dated to around 3rd millennium BC.
>

Regards,
Subramaniam



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jan 27 2000 - 09:11:03 EST