Re: [HM] Binary Numbers


Subject: Re: [HM] Binary Numbers
From: Prof. Lueneburg (luene@mathematik.uni-kl.de)
Date: Wed Dec 31 1969 - 18:59:59 EST


 Dear Colleagues,

 It was known long before Harriot and Leibniz that a natural number can
 be decomposed into a sum of different powers of two. For there were
 sets of weights consisting of pieces of weight w, 2w, 4w, 8w, ... already
 in the 13. century, the so called poids de ville. The oldest known set
 dates from the year 1229 and the longest, still existing set of this
 century has weights 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, 4, 8 ounces. (G. M. M. Houben,
 5000 Years of Weights. Zwolle/Netherlands 1990 ISBN 90-70533-06-5)

 Such a set of weights does not represent a positional system, as the
 powers of 2 are physically present, but it hints to such a system, if
 another positional system is already there. This was the situation in
 the 13. century, as the decimal system came into being at that time in
 occidental Europe.

 Tartaglia mentions systems of weights of that kind. He says that it is
 used mainly to weigh gold, silver and condiments, the latter word being
 only an approximation to Tartaglia's "speciarie". Leibniz also mentions
 this kind of weights in several places. They were often realized as
 nested cup weights.

 Here the quote from Tartaglia's, General trattato II. fol. 14recto (The
 folio in the original carries an incorrect 17.) Venice 1556. The original
 text has no accents, i.e., they are not missing because of the ASCII-code.

 Anchora questa medesima progressione doppia principiante dalla unita
 serue, & si costuma per far li campione per pesare con le bilanze
 materiale, che si oprano per pesare oro, argento, oueramente cose di
 speciarie di valore, ...

 The Anglo-American measures for liquids also follow the powers of two.
 Since when are these measures in use? The use of measures for liquids
 is, of course, different from the use of weights. Nuggets don't care
 about our weighing system, but, yet, we want to weigh them. Milk, however,
 is bought by the pint. So, liquid measures, I think, will not lead us
 to the knowledge that any number is the sum of different powers of two.

 Best regards, Heinz Lueneburg



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jan 28 2000 - 17:58:14 EST