Re: [HM] the importance of notation

Gordon Fisher (gfisher@shentel.net)
Wed, 12 May 1999 09:12:50

At 02:05 PM 5/12/99 +1000, Julie Tolmie wrote:
>
> By the way does anyone know if there is in existence a list (or summary)
> of the notation (symbols and mathematical words) introduced by Bourbaki,
> eg the symbol for the null set and the symbols Q and Z for the rationals
> and the integers?

I've always thought, albeit vaguely, that Z for the integers came earlier
than Bourbaki from German Zyklus or zyklisch, as in cyclic group. I can't
think of a comparable origin for Q, unless maybe from Latin quantum or a
related Latin word, as in "quantity" or "how much", perhaps meant to refer
to the fact that measurements made by physicists, chemists, engineers,
carpenters, etc., generally turn out to be rational numbers.

As for the null set, I don't recall now what symbol the Bourbakists used.
Was it a little square (or rectangle)? Or the Greek letter for what we
call "phi" (pronounced "fie" or "fee", according to your nationality or
native language)? Or what?

Gordon Fisher gfisher@shentel.net