Re: [HM] the importance of notation

William C Waterhouse (wcw@math.psu.edu)
Thu, 13 May 1999 15:39:56 -0400 (EDT)

On Wednesday, 12 May 1999, Gordon Fisher <gfisher@shentel.net>
wrote:
---
And once more I will close with an anecdote.  In a class on real variable
theory, a fellow student and friend of mine who had had a class from a
logician on Russell-Whitehead type logic tried at the blackboard one day to
prove a theorem by putting it into Russell-Whitehead notation and
manipulating the formulas entirely by rules of formal logic, especially
those applying to distribution of quantitifiers.  He got nowhere to speak
of for some time, and the teacher finally interrupted and said with a note
of exasperation, "You can't just manipulate the notation, you need an idea!"
----

"Waring confessed that the demonstration [of Wilson's Theorem] seemed more difficult because no _notation_ can be devised to express a prime number. But in our opinion truths of this kind should be drawn from notions rather than from notations."

--- Gauss, _Disquisitiones Arithmeticae_, Section 76.

William C. Waterhouse Penn State