Re: [HM] Jean Favard

Romulo Lins (romlins@igce.unesp.br)
Sat, 15 May 1999 01:24:20 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Carlos Cesar Araujo: "[HM] Hauber [was: lexicology of mathematics]"
Previous message: Peter Flor: "Re: [HM] Z and Q [was: the importance of notation]"
In reply to: Liliane Beaulieu: "[HM] Jean Favard"
Next in thread: Liliane Beaulieu: "Re: [HM] Jean Favard"

Thank you for the refs. Also, I would like to apologise for the Russian
authors or for the translator of the work I mentioned, who spelled it
'Favart'. Is it usual for names originally in the Latin alphabet to be
'translated' into a Cyrilic form? And in that case, could it be that
Favard would become something which could be read as Favart when
'translated' back to the Latin alphabet?

Romulo

Liliane Beaulieu wrote:
>
> To all concerned about JEAN (not Jacques) FavarD (not FavarT) :

Next message: Carlos Cesar Araujo: "[HM] Hauber [was: lexicology of mathematics]"
Previous message: Peter Flor: "Re: [HM] Z and Q [was: the importance of notation]"
In reply to: Liliane Beaulieu: "[HM] Jean Favard"
Next in thread: Liliane Beaulieu: "Re: [HM] Jean Favard"