Kim Plofker
Department of History of Mathematics
Brown University
>I would like to ask a heretical question.
>
>Is there no *objective* progress, no development, no advance in
>mathematics? Would we not be justified in thinking that our present
>mathematics (as practiced and tought in universities around the world) is
>*objectively* much more advanced than--and in *this* sense superior to--the
>mathematics of the ancient world? And along this *objective* scale of
>progress, is not the mathematics of ancient Greece (as exemplified, say, in
>the writings of Archimedes) considerably more advanced than the mathematics
>of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, as far as we can tell from the documents
>that have come down to us? Or are such non-relativist thoughts simply the
>result of class bias, Eurocentrism and the damage inflicted by imperialism
>on our thinking?
>
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> %% Moshe' Machover | E-MAIL: moshe.machover@kcl.ac.uk %%
> %% Department of Philosophy | FAX (office)*: +44 171 873 2270 %%
> %% King's College, London | PHONE (home)*: +44 181 969 5356 %%
> %% Strand | %%
> %% London WC2R 2LS | * If calling from UK, replace %%
> %% England | +44 by 0 %%
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%