Re: [MATHEDCC] Sound familiar?

Lynn Mack (mack@PED.TEC.SC.US)
Fri, 16 Apr 1999 14:07:47 -0400

Lynn Mack's response:

Being an experienced two-yr college mathematics faculty member(20+)
and for the past 4 yrs the faculty dev. PI for the SC ATE Center
of Excellence, I would like to contribute the following thoughts
on this discussion:
After doing much research I firmly believe
we must change the way we teach to better meet the learning
needs of our diverse students. Question: As a faculty member how
informed are you of current cognitive research? Try reading a new book
just out-
"Designing Brain Compatible Learning" by Terrence Parry and
Gayle Gregory by Skylight Training and Publishing Inc.
(Phone:800-348-4474). This book includes (very comprehensive)
current research on how we learn, active learning, multiple
intelligences,cooperative learning and assessment.

For more ideas on assessment and other strategies to address
changing the learning environment to better assist students
in the learning process try visiting the SC ATE website:
www.scate.org.

In closing, I am now trying to practice what I have learned
and it is not easy- there are many days (and nights) I just want
to go back to lecturing and doing it "my way" but by using the
new techniques and approaches I am seeing
a change in my students and my retention is better(so is
the retention of other faculty members in this project).
I admire all "educators" who continually seek to improve
their classroom strategies to better meet the learning needs of
"all" students.

Lynn G. Mack
Piedmont Technical College
Emerald Road, SC 29648-1647
Phone: 864.941.8449

Robert L Kimball wrote:
>
> It is unfortunate that the people on this list serve are the only ones
> that get to read the comments posted. Your comments are usually very
> thought provoking and meaningful.
>
> Regarding Bret's initial comments and Larry's post on HW;
> As I look back, it is obvious to me, now, that most of the HW I
> assigned to most of the
> students was very meaningless. My request for them to replicate what I
> had done several times meant that most students simply memorized a set
> of steps that got them to what we defined as an answer. I regret that
> my appreciation for the beauty and structure of those
> steps wasn't shared by all my students. Many never saw the big picture
> of how those
> particular tools fit into adequately equipping them to be prepared to
> attack applications
> in other fields--later.
> Now, I try to provide content within the context of applications and
> expect more
> communication from and among students regarding their understanding
> and appreciation
> of the content. ...
> My point is that I think we are getting students who are still being
> taught to expect only homework that requires no thought. Their "lack
> of study skills", I think, are due at least in part to 'our' low
> expectations of them. In our focus groups, students express the
> opinion that we should clearly lay-out what they need to do and how to
> do it. They fight having to develop their own process and prodedure
> and still expect us to provide them with all the information they will
> need.
> It is difficult to change things after many years that build bad
> habits. However, we must help make it clear that we, post secondary
> teachers, expect students who can think and are willing to tackle
> problems by using all their resources (texts, other students,
> experimentation, ...). This is. BTW, also what employers are expecting
> of our students.
>
> Lawrence Gilligan wrote:
>
> Thanks Bret.
>
> I can relate -- it seems to be a repeating theme.
> We could wax philosophic all day on this but there is ONE
> item in your
> conclusion that especially hit home:
>
> >3. I understand all the homework, but I can't do the
> exams. (He made a 30
> >on an exam that exclusively consisted of assigned homework
> problems.)
> >
>
> I have had a little success lately with freshmen as I work
> on their study
> skills. (There isn't much to work with either!!)
> I explain that the reason they can "understand" the homework
> and not do
> well on an exam is the nature of homework -- all problems of
> a similar type
> testing a limited amount of ideas. I tell them that my exam
> questions
> often try to tie a chapter together and I want them to
> THINK, not
> regurgitate. Of course, many books spoon feed them in the
> exercises --
> trying to template the homework after examples.
>
> I urge them to make up sample exams, study with a friend,
> and take their
> friend's exam -- timed, no smashing pumpkins blaring. For
> the first exam,
> I actually pass out the exam I used last quarter two days
> before the actual
> exam. I refuse to do it for the subsequent exams.
>
> Finally, I tell them that they need to spend at least six
> hours of studying
> over several days to do well on one of my exams.
>
> Many of these students are coming out of high school without
> knowing what
> it means to study. These things seem to have helped for the
> more
> conscientious students. The slackers withdraw and take
> someone "easier".
>
> Most of my (engineering technology) students will eventually
> co-op and I
> try to get them to understand that co-op employers (they are
> a tad afraid
> of this impending experience) want them to solve problems
> that others have not.
>
> thanks again,
>
> Larry Gilligan
>
> Lawrence G. Gilligan
> Professor of Mathematics
>
> University of Cincinnati
> OMI College of Applied Science
> 2220 Victory Parkway
> Cincinnati, OH 45206
>
> (513) 556-4868
>
> FAX: (513) 556-4878
>
> http://www.uc.edu/~gilligan
>
> ****************************************************************************
>
> * To post to the list: email
> mathedcc@archives.math.utk.edu *
> * To unsubscribe, send mail to:
> majordomo@archives.math.utk.edu *
> * In the mail message, enter ONLY the words: unsubscribe
> mathedcc *
> * Words in the Subject: line are NOT
> processed! *
> * Archives at
> http://archives.math.utk.edu/hypermail/mathedcc/
> *
> ****************************************************************************
>
>
>
> Name: vcard.vcf
> Part 1.2 Type: text/x-vcard
> Encoding: 7bit
> Description: Card for Robert Kimball

-- 

Fax: 864.941.8555

**************************************************************************** * To post to the list: email mathedcc@archives.math.utk.edu * * To unsubscribe, send mail to: majordomo@archives.math.utk.edu * * In the mail message, enter ONLY the words: unsubscribe mathedcc * * Words in the Subject: line are NOT processed! * * Archives at http://archives.math.utk.edu/hypermail/mathedcc/ * ****************************************************************************