Re: [MATHEDCC] graphing calculators -Reply -Reply

Sandra Chandler (tcchans@tc.cc.va.us)
Fri, 20 Feb 1998 15:51:28 -0500

Derive and the TI merged in the TI-92. It was my understanding: anything =
I could do in Derive, I could do with my handheld TI-92. (Although I have =
not actually compared the two in depth. :-) I would like to know if =
anyone has found something Derive can do that the TI-92 couldn't. I would =
assume the TI-92 would take longer to solve some things because of memory =
constraints on the TI-92 compared to a PC. I'm not going to make it to =
the Gettysburg conference. Any chance I can get a transcript of George =
Dorner's talk via web or email? Also, George, I couldn't find "TICalc.com"=
. What were you referencing?

--------------------
>>> George Dorner <gdorner@HARPER.CC.IL.US> 02/20/1998 Fri 12:04 >>>
(snip)OTOH, I wwould be very
interested in any problems which Derive (or Mathematica or Maple or ...)
handles but which causes the TI-92 to stumble. I haven't found many
which would be routine in the first two years of college math. I will
give a talk loosely based on this theme at the Gettysburg conference on
Derive/TI-92 and more empirical evidence either way will be appreciated.

I HAVE found some which take a long time. Last weekend I modified my
TI-92 per the instructions pointed to at TICalc.com and now it runs
about 3 times as fast.

geo

****************************************************************************
* To post to the list: email mathedcc@archives.math.utk.edu *
* To unsubscribe, send mail to: majordomo@archives.math.utk.edu *
* In the mail message, enter ONLY the words: unsubscribe mathedcc *
* Words in the Subject: line are NOT processed! *
* Archives at http://archives.math.utk.edu/hypermail/mathedcc/ *
****************************************************************************