Re: riddle inside a riddle

Bret Taylor (bret@IAG.NET)
Fri, 17 Jan 1997 14:28:50 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Geoffrey Akst: "Are lotteries worth it?"
Previous message: John M. Flanigan: "Re: riddle inside a riddle"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Kraisler: "riddle inside a riddle"
Next in thread: Sam Evers: "Re: riddle inside a riddle"

At 12:12 PM 1/17/97 EST, you wrote:
>It's Friday so this seems an appropriate time to share this definition :-)
>
>Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
>
>Roberta
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------------------------
> Roberta S. Lacefield (912) 285-6027 Fax: (912) 287-4909
> Waycross College email: RSL094@fox.way.peachnet.edu
> 2001 S. Georgia Pkwy
> Waycross, GA 31503
> http://members.tripod.com/~Roberta/index.html
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------------------------
>Note: The opinions expressed here are constantly mutating and may already
>have changed
> by the time you read this.
>
I have heard this definition -

Lottery: A voluntary tax on the stupid.

Bret Taylor Lake-Sumter Community College Leesburg FL

"It matters not the subject taught, nor all the books on all the shelves.
What matters more, yes most of all, is what the teachers are themselves."
John Wooden

John 3: 33 + 3

Next message: Geoffrey Akst: "Are lotteries worth it?"
Previous message: John M. Flanigan: "Re: riddle inside a riddle"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Kraisler: "riddle inside a riddle"
Next in thread: Sam Evers: "Re: riddle inside a riddle"