I've toil(et)ed this far afield in the hope that something so sickening will put an
end to this nonsense.
geoff
Phil Mahler wrote:
> > At 7:51 PM +0000 1/17/98, Phil Mahler wrote:
> > >>My favorite, of course, is the equation having an x^7, the septic equation;
> > >
> > >If f(x) = x^7 would be the septic function, could we say that its
> > >inverse, f^(-1)(x) = x^(1/7) is the antiseptic function?
> > >
> > >Phll Mahler
> > >Middlesex CC
> > >Bedford, MA
> >
> > Touche. And if we had a two or more equations involving x^7?
> >
> > mark snyder
>
> took me a while... A septic system? :-)
****************************************************************************
* To post to the list: email mathedcc@archives.math.utk.edu *
* To unsubscribe, send mail to: majordomo@archives.math.utk.edu *
* In the mail message, enter ONLY the words: unsubscribe mathedcc *
* Words in the Subject: line are NOT processed! *
* Archives at http://archives.math.utk.edu/hypermail/mathedcc/ *
****************************************************************************