On 27 Aug 1997, Martin KALMAR wrote:
>
> Barbara Arementa wrote that her math department's criteria for the contents
> of a liberal arts math course was "make it relevant...real life...usable"
>
> I wonder if anyone out there thinks that there is any value in teaching
> mathematics that isn't relevant or usuable. (When student's ask me why
> they need to take math, I like to tell them that I wish I could say that
> it is totally irrelevant and unusable.) Do English teachers choose the
> literture that liberal arts students must take, do they worry about relevance
> or usability? Is there any value in teaching mathematics that is
> intellectually interesting or beautiful or fun?
>
>
> Martin Kalmar
> Frederick Community College
> Frederick, Md
>
> martin_kalmar@co.frederick.md.us
>
> ****************************************************************************
> * To post to the list: email mathedcc@archives.math.utk.edu *
> * To unsubscribe, send mail to: majordomo@archives.math.utk.edu *
> * In the mail message, enter ONLY the words: unsubscribe mathedcc *
> * Words in the Subject: line are NOT processed! *
> * Archives at http://archives.math.utk.edu/hypermail/mathedcc/ *
> ****************************************************************************
>
****************************************************************************
* To post to the list: email mathedcc@archives.math.utk.edu *
* To unsubscribe, send mail to: majordomo@archives.math.utk.edu *
* In the mail message, enter ONLY the words: unsubscribe mathedcc *
* Words in the Subject: line are NOT processed! *
* Archives at http://archives.math.utk.edu/hypermail/mathedcc/ *
****************************************************************************